Home   Boston   Article

Subscribe Now

Boston Borough Council’s planning committee passes plans for 231 homes




Permission has been granted for two major housing developments in and around Boston, totalling 231 new homes.

Boston Borough Council’s planning committee approved the applications during a meeting on Tuesday, May 6.

One proposal, for 142 homes on land off Puritan Way, was submitted by James and Susan Gosling, Katie Newton, Margaret Leggate and Rita Wicks. The other, for 89 homes on land to the east of Gaysfield Road, Fishtoft, came from Gleeson Regeneration Ltd.

Proposed street scenes for plans to build 89 new homes on land to the East of Gaysfield Road, Fishtoft, Image: Gleeson Regeneration/Boston Borough Council
Proposed street scenes for plans to build 89 new homes on land to the East of Gaysfield Road, Fishtoft, Image: Gleeson Regeneration/Boston Borough Council

At the same meeting, members refused plans for 102 homes on land next to White House Lane in Fishtoft from Opal Homes, citing concerns over density and that the development would be out of keeping with nearby residential areas.

Council leader Anne Dorrian proposed rejecting the application, seconded by deputy leader Dale Broughton, though not all members were in agreement.

Coun Peter Bedford (Independent) warned: "If this goes to appeal, we’ll lose it."

The proposed site plan to build 89 new homes on land to the East of Gaysfield Road, Fishtoft, Image: Gleeson Regeneration/Boston Borough Council
The proposed site plan to build 89 new homes on land to the East of Gaysfield Road, Fishtoft, Image: Gleeson Regeneration/Boston Borough Council

The proposal from Gleeson Regeneration also proved controversial, following an objection from Fishtoft Parish Council, which argued the village lacks the infrastructure to absorb another 89 homes.

Coun James Cantwell (Conservative) said the "dramatic increase" in properties in Fishtoft was not justified. However, planning officers pointed to two existing applications on the same site, together totalling more than 60 homes, and described the uplift as minor.

Meanwhile, Coun Stephen Woodliffe (Independent) raised concerns about potential flooding, noting the site lies within Flood Risk Zone 3. "A person wouldn't want to buy a property here," he said.

However, he accepted this was not sufficient grounds for refusal, as Anglian Water had raised no objection and had confirmed the local system could accommodate foul water flows.

A vote to refuse the application failed. A second vote, in line with the officer’s recommendation to approve, was then held and passed.



Comments | 0
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies - Learn More